Product Liability & Class Actions
If a product injures you, your first priority should be your health and safety: seek any needed medical attention and make sure the injury is documented by healthcare providers. As soon as you are able, preserve the evidence – keep the product (and any packaging or receipts) in a safe place, and take photos of the product and your injuries, because this evidence can be crucial in a legal claim. It’s also wise to record the details of what happened (when, where, how the incident occurred) and gather contact information for any witnesses who saw the accident or defect. You should report the issue if appropriate (for example, to a relevant government agency or consumer safety commission, especially if the defect poses a broader risk), but avoid giving detailed statements to the manufacturer or insurance companies before getting legal advice. Finally, consult an experienced product liability attorney promptly – an attorney can evaluate your case, help determine if others have suffered the same problem (which could lead to a class action or mass tort), and ensure that a lawsuit is filed within the required time limits (Massachusetts, for instance, generally has a three-year statute of limitations for injury claims). By taking these steps, you protect your rights and build a stronger foundation for seeking compensation for your injuries.
Yes. If you are harmed by an AI-powered device, autonomous vehicle, or other advanced technology, you may have the right to pursue a product liability or negligence lawsuit against the companies responsible. Manufacturers and software developers have a duty to design and program these technologies safely. For example, if a self-driving car’s autonomous driving system malfunctions and causes an accident, the injured parties can seek to hold the car maker or technology provider liable for the defect or inadequate safety measures. Likewise, if a consumer product that uses artificial intelligence (such as a smart home device or robotic appliance) is unreasonably dangerous due to a design flaw or failure to warn, the injured user can file a claim for compensation just as they would for any other defective product. These are emerging areas of law, and courts are adapting traditional legal principles to new technology – but fundamentally, the law aims to ensure that innovations do not come at the expense of consumer safety. Victims of AI-driven harm should know that they are not without recourse: with the help of legal counsel, they can seek accountability and damages from companies that release unsafe tech products into the marketplace.
Ghost guns are privately assembled firearms that lack serial numbers, typically made from kits or 3D-printed components, which makes them untraceable. Because ghost guns can be bought and built without background checks or identification, they have become a way for individuals who cannot legally own firearms (such as felons or minors) to obtain weapons, leading to serious concerns about public safety and gun violence. When it comes to legal accountability, those who manufacture, sell, or facilitate the distribution of ghost gun kits can potentially be held liable, especially if they violate state or federal laws. Many jurisdictions, including Massachusetts, have enacted strict laws banning ghost guns and requiring firearm serialization – meaning that selling these untraceable gun parts to residents is illegal and can be the basis for civil action or enforcement. Victims of crimes involving ghost guns (or government authorities on behalf of the public) have started to pursue lawsuits against suppliers of ghost gun components, using theories like negligence, public nuisance, and consumer protection law. For example, state attorneys general have filed suits under consumer protection statutes (similar to Chapter 93A in Massachusetts) against out-of-state companies that shipped ghost gun parts into states with bans, seeking to stop those sales and penalize the companies. While these cases are complex – in part due to federal laws that shield lawful gun manufacturers – those protections do not apply when companies break the law. Therefore, if a ghost gun contributed to someone’s injury or death, there may be legal avenues to hold the sellers or makers accountable for the harm caused by these untraceable weapons. The overall goal of such litigation is to reduce the availability of ghost guns, enforce existing gun safety laws, and secure justice for individuals and communities harmed by illegal firearms.
Victims in product liability and class action cases can seek a range of compensatory damages and other remedies designed to make them whole and to prevent further harm. The specific compensation available will depend on the case, but common forms include:
Medical expenses: repayment for hospital bills, surgeries, medication, rehabilitation, and any future medical care related to the injury or illness caused by the product or misconduct.
Lost income and economic losses: compensation for wages lost due to time off work, diminished earning capacity if the injury affects the ability to work in the future, or other out-of-pocket costs (for example, the cost of replacing a dangerous product or repairing property damage it caused).
Pain and suffering: monetary damages for the physical pain, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life resulting from the injury. In a class action context (such as a consumer fraud case where physical injury might not be involved), this could translate to statutory damages or a sum to compensate for inconvenience, anxiety, or other non-economic harm suffered by consumers.
Wrongful death damages: if a defective product or corporate wrongdoing caused a loss of life, the victim’s family can seek damages under wrongful death statutes – this may cover funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship/consortium. Massachusetts law, for instance, permits the estate and beneficiaries to recover such damages and, in cases of gross negligence or malicious conduct causing death, potentially punitive damages.
In addition to compensatory damages, product liability and class action cases can lead to punitive damages (also known as exemplary damages) in some instances. Punitive damages are awarded not to compensate the victim for losses, but to punish particularly egregious wrongdoing and deter the defendant and others from similar behavior. These are more common when evidence shows a company acted with gross negligence, fraud, or a willful disregard for safety. (For example, a jury might award punitive damages if a manufacturer knowingly sold a dangerously defective product and hid the risk from the public.)
Equitable and injunctive remedies are also possible. A court can order the defendant to take certain actions to fix the problem: this could mean issuing a recall or repair for a defective product, halting an unsafe practice, correcting false advertising, or cleaning up environmental damage caused by the misconduct. In class actions, settlements often include such forward-looking relief – for instance, a company might agree to change its advertising disclosures or improve safety testing protocols as part of resolving the lawsuit.
Furthermore, laws like Chapter 93A in Massachusetts and RICO at the federal level provide for multiple damages and attorney’s fees in qualifying cases, which, while not a direct compensation category for the victim’s losses, are important tools. They ensure that plaintiffs can recover the costs of bringing the lawsuit (such as legal fees) and, when misconduct was willful, receive two to three times the actual damages as a way to hold the defendant fully accountable.
It’s important to note that every case is different – the exact damages will depend on the facts and the applicable law. In a class action, any monetary award or settlement typically gets distributed among class members (sometimes each member receives a modest amount or benefits like free services or monitoring, depending on the injury). In individual cases, the award is specific to the person’s losses. While no outcome is guaranteed, the goal of pursuing a product liability or class action case is to obtain meaningful relief: paying for victims’ losses, delivering some measure of justice for the harm done, and often spurring changes that protect others from future harm.
We advocate for individuals, families, and communities harmed by dangerous products or corporate misconduct, with a focus on consumer safety, public health, and environmental accountability.
1B+
$165B
9GT
$6B
Overview
Industrial Pollution & Respiratory Health
Your Rights
As a plaintiff in product liability and class action cases, you have essential rights that empower you to hold responsible parties accountable. Examples include:
- Advocate for Your Rights and Recovery: When you suffer due to negligence you have the right to hold those at fault accountable and to seek compensation for hardships such as medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and in certain cases punitive damages.
- Building Your Strongest Case: Your story is important, and so is the evidence supporting it. We're here to help you gather all necessary documentation, from medical records to expert testimonies, helping ensure your case is meticulously thorough and compelling.
- Pursuing Justice After Trial: Sometimes, the journey to justice doesn't end with the initial verdict. If the outcome isn’t in your favor and grounds for appeal exist, we stand ready to support your appeal, advancing your case to a higher court if needed.
Wearable devices can offer health benefits but also raise privacy, health, and safety concerns.
Lawyers' Role
- Selective Case Evaluation: We carefully assess claims, prioritizing those with strong evidence and substantial merit to allocate resources to matters with the greatest potential for meaningful impact.
- Informed Settlement Strategies: We approach settlements with a nuanced grasp of product liability law, seeking resolutions that are both timely and reflective of the true scope of your case.
- Integration of Technical Expertise: Our approach harnesses the collective knowledge of experts, from medical professionals to safety engineers, to fortify your claim with clear and convincing evidence.
- Targeted Trial Strategy: Our trial preparedness is not a last resort but a strategic component, ensuring we're ready to pivot from negotiation to litigation seamlessly to protect your interests.