Deepfake & AI Image Litigation
Deepfake & AI Image Litigation
When Al is used to create, distribute, or host non-consensual intimate images, voice clones, or synthetic media of real individuals, victims may pursue criminal referrals and civil claims.
Federal Legal Framework
Overview
We represent victims across Massachusetts of AI-generated non-consensual images, voice clones, and synthetic media, pursuing civil remedies against the creators, distributors, and platforms responsible.
Massachusetts and State Claims
Massachusetts provides independent grounds for civil recovery through multiple causes of action: invasion of privacy under the Massachusetts Privacy Act, which prohibits unreasonable intrusion upon a person’s seclusion or likeness, Chapter 93A claims where the creation or distribution of deepfakes constitutes an unfair or deceptive practice, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation where the synthetic media conveys false statements of fact, and, where applicable, state civil rights claims. As of early 2026, 47 states have enacted deepfake legislation, creating an expanding network of state-level civil and criminal remedies that may apply depending on where the content was created, distributed, or viewed.
Types of Deepfake Claims
Claims arise across a range of harmful conduct: non-consensual intimate images generated by AI tools using a victim’s likeness, voice cloning and synthetic audio used for fraud, impersonation, or harassment, deepfake video distributed on social media or messaging platforms, AI-generated child sexual abuse material, corporate or employment-related deepfakes used for reputational harm or coercion, and platform liability where hosting services fail to comply with takedown obligations under the Take It Down Act.
Platform Accountability
What to Bring to a Consultation
Relevant materials may include screenshots or archived copies of the non-consensual content (with URL, date, and platform information), takedown requests submitted to platforms and any responses received, evidence identifying the creator or distributor of the content, communications related to the creation or distribution of the deepfake, records of emotional, reputational, or financial harm, and any law enforcement reports or referrals. Not all victims will have documentation. The absence of records does not preclude a viable claim. Many cases rely on digital forensics, platform records obtained through discovery, and metadata analysis. Deepfake claims in Massachusetts may involve parallel sexual abuse litigation theories, data privacy violations, civil rights protections, and Chapter 93A consumer protection claims against platforms and individuals.