Institutional Sexual Abuse Claims

When schools, religious institutions, healthcare facilities, youth organizations, or employers fail to protect individuals in their care from sexual abuse, survivors may pursue civil claims against both the perpetrator and the institution.

Advocate for survivors of institutional sexual abuse in Massachusetts
More than 50% of women and nearly 30% of men in the U.S. have experienced contact sexual violence.

Institutional Liability Theories

Civil claims against institutions typically proceed under three theories: negligent supervision, where the institution knew or should have known of an employee’s propensity for abuse; negligent hiring and retention, where the institution employed or kept an individual despite prior complaints or known red flags; and respondeat superior, where the abuse was facilitated by the perpetrator’s institutional role. Massachusetts courts impose heightened duties of care on institutions with custodial or fiduciary relationships, and inadequate screening, reporting, or oversight may constitute independent grounds for liability. Remedies may include compensation for emotional distress, therapy costs, lost earnings, and, in cases of willful institutional misconduct, punitive damages.

Overview

U.S. Catholic dioceses and religious orders alone have paid more than $5 billion to resolve sexual abuse claims over the past two decades. 1
Georgetown University, Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA), Annual Survey of Allegations and Costs (2025).
Statute of limitations for childhood sexual abuse claims
Approximately 90% of child sexual abuse is committed by someone the child knows and trusts. 2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2024).

Statute of Limitations in Massachusetts

Massachusetts law gives survivors of childhood sexual abuse two paths to file civil claims: within 35 years of the date the abuse occurred, or within 7 years of the date the survivor discovered the connection between the abuse and an emotional or psychological injury, whichever period is longer. For many survivors, the discovery rule extends the filing window well beyond the 35-year period. Institutional defendants routinely challenge timeliness, and evidence critical to overcoming those challenges may degrade with delay.

Types of Institutional Claims

Claims arise across a range of institutional settings: schools and universities, where faculty, coaches, or staff exploit positions of authority; religious organizations, where clergy or lay employees commit abuse and leadership conceals or fails to report it; youth-serving organizations, where inadequate vetting or supervision enables abuse; healthcare and residential facilities, where patients or residents are abused by staff; and correctional and detention facilities, where detainees are subjected to sexual abuse by officers or staff.
Confidential consultation for sexual abuse survivors
Massachusetts law gives survivors of childhood institutional abuse up to 35 years to bring civil claims.

Confidentiality and Pseudonymous Filing

Massachusetts courts may permit survivors to proceed under a pseudonym to protect their identity during litigation. Whether pseudonymous filing is granted depends on the circumstances of the case and requires a motion supported by specific factual grounds. Protective orders may also limit the disclosure of sensitive information during discovery. The firm evaluates confidentiality options at the outset of every engagement and structures litigation to protect the survivor’s privacy to the greatest extent permitted by law.

What to Bring to a Consultation

Relevant materials may include any written records of the abuse or its aftermath, communications with the institution (including complaints, reports, or responses), records of counseling or therapy, personnel records or public reports identifying the perpetrator, and any prior legal proceedings or settlements involving the same institution or individual. Not all survivors will have documentation. The absence of written records does not preclude a viable claim. Many cases are built on testimony, institutional patterns, and records obtained through discovery. Institutional abuse claims in Massachusetts may involve parallel civil rights theories, consumer protection claims, and employment retaliation protections depending on the setting and circumstances of the abuse.

Contact

DISCLAIMER:

The use of this website or contact form to communicate with this firm or any of its attorneys/members does not establish an attorney–client relationship. Time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. All information provided will be kept strictly confidential.